Recursos en Espa–ol
TAKE THE HATE OUT OF THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE

Janet Murguía’s Appearance on Lou Dobbs, Febrary 4, 2008

DOBBS: Janet Murguia is the president of the National Council of La Raza. She attacked me last week for in her words "handing hate a microphone" and for driving the debate on illegal immigration in such a way that demonizes the Hispanic community. She is also criticizing the presidential candidates for their newfound focus on illegal immigration.

We called Janet Murguia and we're told that -- at least I found out today, before we could ask you, your PR director asked us for you to be here, and we're delighted you are.

Janet Murguia joins us now.

OK. You and I have talked over the years, many times about illegal immigration. You accused me of being basically a hatemonger. And the reality is, I'm not. And you know that. So let's get to...

JANET MURGUIA, PRESIDENT, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF LA RAZA: OK.

DOBBS: ... what in the world are you doing with this organization?

MURGUIA: Well, I think the key fact is that we can document now a wave of hate and different ways in which that...

DOBBS: Let's be -- no, I want to be specific.

MURGUIA: Different ways in which the hate is manifested.

DOBBS: You're talking about me.

MURGUIA: Again...

DOBBS: You're talking about me.

MURGUIA: Let me just make my case.

DOBBS: Sure.

MURGUIA: We're talking about a wave of hate and the way that that hate is manifested in different representatives that you have on this show.

We have got self-avowed vigilante representatives. This is Chris Simcox. He's been on your show five times on CNN.

DOBBS: The founder of the Minutemen.

MURGUIA: Founder of the Minuteman Project. And according to the SPLC, Southern Poverty...

DOBBS: Which is nothing more than a fund-raising and...

MURGUIA: That's your opinion. Let me just get this stuff...

DOBBS: That's right, but I'm going to tell you what it is.

MURGUIA: Simcox was convicted in 2003 of carrying a weapon in the national park while searching for undocumented immigrants. That same year, he was quoted in an Orange County newspaper saying, "So far, we've had restraint, but I'm afraid that restraint is wearing thin. Take heed of our weapons, because we are going to defend our borders by any means necessary."

He's a self-avowed vigilante...

DOBBS: Is he in charge of the Minutemen?

MURGUIA: Yes. He's the founder of the...

DOBBS: No, he's not.

MURGUIA: ... of the Minutemen Project.

DOBBS: He's no longer associated with the Minutemen.

MURGUIA: He is associated and is a spokesperson...

DOBBS: No.

MURGUIA: ... and was a spokesperson all these times.

DOBBS: Jim Gilchrist?

MURGUIA: Jim Gilchrist -- co-founder of the Minutemen Project, self-avowed vigilante. And he's been on your show eight times and on CNN 27 times.

You said that you proudly, proudly support these projects, that they're fine Americans and who make up all...

DOBBS: Can we see what you...

MURGUIA: Sure. I'm sorry. You said that you support the Minuteman Project, and that they're fine Americans who make it up in all they've accomplished fully, relentlessly, and proudly.

DOBBS: Right.

MURGUIA: So I want to make sure you understand. These are folks who are documented to be part of hate groups.

DOBBS: Who documented them?

MURGUIA: Southern Poverty Leadership...

DOBBS: Southern Poverty Law Center...

MURGUIA: And the American Defamation League, ADL.

DOBBS: Both of whom are absolute advocate groups for open borders and amnesty for illegal aliens. MURGUIA: That's your opinion.

DOBBS: No, it's not my opinion.

MURGUIA: Yes, it is your opinion.

DOBBS: No, it's a fact.

MURGUIA: We have a Web site that documents not just these individuals, but others who are tied to hate groups or vigilante groups...

DOBBS: What did President Bush call them?

MURGUIA: ... and we've seen them on the air...

DOBBS: What did...

MURGUIA: ... relentlessly...

DOBBS: You have never...

MURGUIA: ... representing a point of view on immigration. It's like having David Duke on a panel to talk about affirmative action.

DOBBS: You're way...

MURGUIA: It's unaccepted -- it's unacceptable...

DOBBS: You're way overreaching (ph)...

MURGUIA: And we don't want to tolerate it anymore. We're taking our case to the network heads and we're asking them to hold the networks accountable. We want to hold...

DOBBS: You want me fired, don't you?

MURGUIA: No, I'm saying that...

DOBBS: Don't you want me fired?

MURGUIA: No, I want to hold you accountable for how you use your microphone every night.

DOBBS: Who am I to be accountable to? You?

MURGUIA: No. You're accountable to the broader...

DOBBS: Aren't I accountable to my audience?

MURGUIA: You're accountable to the broader public, in making sure that we're bringing factual information...

DOBBS: OK, let's talk about some facts, shall we?

MURGUIA: ... to the people. DOBBS: I want you to get through your charts.

MURGUIA: Sure.

DOBBS: I want to point out one thing, if I may, on this. The statement about the Minutemen came after President Bush had called the Minutemen vigilantes.

MURGUIA: That's right.

DOBBS: The fact is, that the Minutemen -- and please, this is your opportunity. The Minutemen have never, ever been charged with an act of violence...

MURGUIA: Chris Simcox was arrested and convicted.

DOBBS: Oh, was he a member of the Minutemen when that occurred?

MURGUIA: Yes. It was in 2003, and he was founder of the Minutemen Project.

DOBBS: And he was doing what?

MURGUIA: He was convicted -- arrested and convicted of carrying a gun into a national park searching for undocumented immigrants. All this is documented on our Web site.

DOBBS: So you would cast the entire organization of the Minutemen...

MURGUIA: I'm casting him. I'm holding you accountable for putting him on the airwaves and saying that he is an expert on immigration reform. That's ridiculous. He's not an expert on immigration reform.

DOBBS: Did we say he was an expert, or did we say that he was one of the founders of the Minutemen?

MURGUIA: I think you couch this -- you gave him this aura of respectability. You also cited in 2006 a source of your, you know, branding it CNN and Lou Dobbs, around the Council of Conservative Citizens, which also the SPLC has named as a white nationalist hate group. This is a group that denigrates routinely blacks as genetically inferior, complained about, you know, Jewish power, and also denigrated homosexuals as perverted sodomites.

All I'm saying is, you're co-branding yourself and CNN with a white supremacist nationalist hate group.

DOBBS: Did we do that?

MURGUIA: This...

DOBBS: Did we really?

MURGUIA: ... was on your program on May 23rd... DOBBS: How long was that on the air?

MURGUIA: ... 2006.

DOBBS: How long was that...

MURGUIA: It doesn't matter how long.

DOBBS: Of course it does.

MURGUIA: It doesn't.

DOBBS: Of course it does.

MURGUIA: You're using hate speech, hate group to make a case on immigration.

DOBBS: I'm going to tell you straight up...

MURGUIA: To make a case on immigration.

DOBBS: Do you want the answer?

MURGUIA: Sure.

DOBBS: You want to know how long it was on the air?

MURGUIA: It doesn't matter.

DOBBS: Seconds. You have just given them more airtime than this network, this broadcast ever did.

MURGUIA: And I'm holding you accountable for having given them any sort of exposure.

DOBBS: Oh, you are?

MURGUIA: And the fact that you're associating yourself...

DOBBS: So you should be...

MURGUIA: ... with this extremist...

DOBBS: I associated myself?

MURGUIA: You cite them as a fact...

DOBBS: I did?

MURGUIA: ... on this...

DOBBS: Did I?

MURGUIA: This says, "Dobbs -- LOU DOBBS TONIGHT, CNN."

DOBBS: Right. MURGUIA: That's there for everyone to see.

DOBBS: Right.

MURGUIA: This is from your show on May 23rd, 2006.

DOBBS: Right.

MURGUIA: This kind of hate speech, this kind...

DOBBS: What year?

MURGUIA: 2006.

DOBBS: You got anything a little more recent?

MURGUIA: We have got a whole Web site that documents all of this.

DOBBS: I -- let's go through your Web site. OK?

MURGUIA: Yes, sure.

DOBBS: Let's go through this.

MURGUIA: Yes. Because we've made a case.

DOBBS: I want you to...

MURGUIA: We want to make sure that you need to know. Just make one point -- hate speech has consequences. We have seen the rise in hate crimes in the same time that these types of comments and people were on your show and on other CNN shows...

DOBBS: So I'm responsible for that?

MURGUIA: ... Fox, MSNBC -- we're holding all three networks. We saw a rise in hate crimes against Hispanics raised by 23 percent. And twice that in California.

Hate speech has consequences.

DOBBS: Janet, OK, is it my turn? You have now been talking for over four minutes.

MURGUIA: You have the mike every night.

DOBBS: So you're taking it away from me tonight?

MURGUIA: I'm just saying, I want to make my case.

DOBBS: So you wouldn't like -- OK.

MURGUIA: I appreciate...

DOBBS: Would you like me to -- OK. So what would you like me to do? I will tell you what, we'll give you some more time, and then I'll respond to you tomorrow evening.

MURGUIA: OK.

DOBBS: How about it?

MURGUIA: Well, I appreciate that.

I just want to make sure you know, for us, it's intolerable and untenable.

DOBBS: Who's us?

MURGUIA: The National Council of La Raza. We represent a civil rights and advocacy organization...

DOBBS: You're a civil rights and...

MURGUIA: ... for 40 years.

DOBBS: You're a socio-ethnocentric organization with a specific interest in driving illegal immigration and amnesty, and you know it.

MURGUIA: That's your opinion.

DOBBS: You are being...

MURGUIA: That's your opinion. That's like me saying...

DOBBS: You are...

MURGUIA: ... you're part of the media elites...

DOBBS: You are racially focused (ph)...

MURGUIA: ... because CNN is a conglomerate.

DOBBS: If I...

MURGUIA: We represent 40 years of history in this country of advancing...

DOBBS: You are abusing it...

MURGUIA: ... the interests of Hispanics.

DOBBS: You are abusing it now in a way...

MURGUIA: And when you attack immigrants...

DOBBS: ... that's (inaudible).

MURGUIA: You're attacking now...

DOBBS: I have never attacked an immigrant, ever.

MURGUIA: When you use these kinds of representatives... DOBBS: No, I have never, ever.

MURGUIA: When you use these kinds of representatives...

DOBBS: Have I ever attacked an immigrant? Have I ever?

MURGUIA: I'm saying that when you...

DOBBS: Have I ever spoken against legal immigration in this country?

MURGUIA: You make a case...

DOBBS: Have I ever...

MURGUIA: ... supporting these individuals.

DOBBS: I have made a case...

MURGUIA: Dan Stein with FAIR...

DOBBS: ... for securing the borders.

MURGUIA: FAIR is a known, documented hate group.

DOBBS: Dan...

MURGUIA: They receive...

DOBBS: They're a hate group?

MURGUIA: That's correct.

DOBBS: From -- oh my gosh. You...

MURGUIA: This is now -- this is from the Southern Poverty Law Center. They document that their founder, their creator, is John Tanton, a man who remains on FAIR's board and operates a racist publishing company. He once has compared immigrants to bacteria...

DOBBS: Janet -- OK.

MURGUIA: FAIR has employed members of white supremacists. They promote racist conspiracy theories, and they receive funding from the Pioneer Fund, which is a racist foundation devoted to eugenics and proving a connection between race and IQ.

You trot these folks out. You cloak them with an air of respectability, and you give them a platform. That's not acceptable to us, to have these kinds of individuals spewing their rhetoric...

DOBBS: Well, you're -- I guess what I'm saying is...

MURGUIA: ... on this...

DOBBS: ... ladi-da, it's not acceptable to you. What gives you such special prerogative here?

MURGUIA: It's not me. This is hate speech.

DOBBS: Who is this -- I'm sorry...

MURGUIA: This should be offensive not just to us.

DOBBS: ... you're the one who's making the charge.

MURGUIA: These types of individuals and the words that they use have consequences. We've seen that documented over the period of the last three years.

(CROSSTALK)

MURGUIA: According to the FBI and the Department of Justice, and that's on our Web site too.

I want folks to be able to know that there is a wave of hate out there. It's being generated in many respects by the cable news networks, and we want to hold them accountable for the individuals that they're using on the airwaves. And we don't want commentators parroting their speech, because it only manifests...

DOBBS: Well, I'm a lot of things, but I'm sure not a bigot and I'm sure not a parrot. And I think what gives you the greatest trouble is I'm an independent, and I'm not going to put up with the nonsense, whether it originates with La Raza, whether it originates with FAIR, and the fact that you...

MURGUIA: This isn't about you, Lou.

DOBBS: Oh, yes, it is.

MURGUIA: No, it's not.

DOBBS: Yes, it is.

MURGUIA: It's about holding...

DOBBS: You have attacked me.

MURGUIA: ... your network accountable.

DOBBS: You called me...

MURGUIA: It's about holding your network accountable...

DOBBS: My network is accountable...

MURGUIA: ... for allowing...

DOBBS: ... every day.

MURGUIA: Well, we are going to make sure...

DOBBS: This network...

MURGUIA: ... that that's the case.

DOBBS: Oh, you're not going to make certain at all.

MURGUIA: We are meeting -- I already have a meeting with CNN worldwide president...

DOBBS: Jim Walton.

MURGUIA: ... Mr. Jim Walton...

DOBBS: Right.

MURGUIA: ... to talk to him about this.

DOBBS: He's a good man to start with.

MURGUIA: Well, we're going to hold you accountable. We're going to hold the other networks accountable.

DOBBS: And what are you going to do?

MURGUIA: We're going to ask them to remove these kinds of representatives...

DOBBS: So you want me -- you want me fired?

MURGUIA: Not you. I said these representatives, who are tied to vigilante and hate groups, as documented by the ADL or by the Southern Poverty Law Center. They have no place on the airwaves.

DOBBS: Let me tell you something: The Southern Poverty Law Center...

MURGUIA: And we want to make sure that you're not parroting their speech.

DOBBS: Now -- now, may I respond? Now, for you to inject hate and bigotry into this debate on illegal immigration...

MURGUIA: I didn't inject it.

DOBBS: ... on your Web site...

MURGUIA: I didn't inject it. I can document how it has been injected.

DOBBS: It's my turn. It's my turn. I've given you, I think, seven, eight minutes.

Let's start with the reality. I have never said a word against a legal immigrant into this country, nor would I ever. I have called for more legal immigration, not less.

Now, listen. I listened to you, OK? I want to -- do we have that record on -- let's put up the -- you said a 23 percent increase in hate crimes against Hispanics. Can we put up the full screen on this?

MURGUIA: You know, the ADL documents code words for hate.

DOBBS: The ADL -- oh, yes, sure.

MURGUIA: And you've used a few of those code words for hate.

DOBBS: Name one code word.

MURGUIA: Well, they talk about dehumanizing. They're demonizing immigrants...

DOBBS: That's their word. That's not my word.

MURGUIA: Well, I'm telling you, they've had a...

DOBBS: What's my word?

MURGUIA: ... clear record of documented hate speech.

DOBBS: They have.

MURGUIA: Yes, they have. They are a very well respected voice.

DOBBS: Not by me.

MURGUIA: The Anti-Defamation League...

DOBBS: They are a joke.

MURGUIA: They are not a joke. They are an outstanding organization.

DOBBS: I want you to go to that Web site of yours and listen to that discussion on there. That woman is a joke. OK?

MURGUIA: That's your opinion. We document this.

DOBBS: It's my opinion.

MURGUIA: She talks about...

DOBBS: May I continue?

MURGUIA: ... the efforts to dehumanize and demonize Latinos.

DOBBS: Would you please -- oh, come on.

MURGUIA: When you refer to them as bringing in massive disease, as we know you have...

DOBBS: Do you -- excuse me...

MURGUIA: We can document that.

DOBBS: Eight seconds on the air, referring one time -- let me ask you something. Do you think that illegal aliens should be exempt from public health standards that are applied to every legal immigrant in this country, is that what you're saying?

MURGUIA: This is about code words for hate speech.

DOBBS: Code words.

MURGUIA: That's right.

DOBBS: You are...

MURGUIA: And we document that...

DOBBS: Janet, you and your organization...

MURGUIA: ... on the Web site.

DOBBS: ... are completely out of your minds on this issue. If you think -- you have -- are you calling me a bigot?

MURGUIA: Lou, I stand by my record as leading an organization...

DOBBS: You can stand by your record as you want to...

MURGUIA: ... for 40 years as a civil rights advocacy organization, represents 44 million Hispanics in this country.

DOBBS: You're sitting here, attacking freedom of speech, suggesting that the only one who can oppose you would be (inaudible)...

MURGUIA: We have to draw the line on freedom of speech, when freedom of speech becomes hate speech.

DOBBS: You wouldn't be involved in this debate if it were not...

MURGUIA: Hate speech is not acceptable.

DOBBS: Excuse me. You would not even be involved in this debate on illegal immigration unless the preponderance of those illegal aliens were Hispanic. And you know that is a fact.

MURGUIA: I know...

DOBBS: I would be involved in this debate no matter what.

MURGUIA: ... that we can't stand for dehumanizing and demonizing and scapegoating a segment of our society...

DOBBS: Then why in the world have you not taken on the government of Mexico and Central America, and those who create the conditions that drive -- that drive illegal immigration?

MURGUIA: We have been engaged in this issue...

DOBBS: You have not been engaged.

MURGUIA: Yes, we have. And we are making...

DOBBS: You have not. When was the last time you spoke...

MURGUIA: ... every case right now...

DOBBS: ... with the...

MURGUIA: ... to push back on the hate that dehumanizes...

DOBBS: When was the last time -- when is the last time you even addressed a foreign government and the quality...

MURGUIA: I'm concerned about what's happening here in this country.

DOBBS: Oh, I see.

MURGUIA: This is about...

DOBBS: Why aren't you worrying about our borders being secured, our ports being secured? Why aren't you worried about building...

MURGUIA: We are for comprehensive immigration reform, but this is about hate speech.

DOBBS: Comprehensive immigration reform?

MURGUIA: This is about hate speech, and it has no place...

DOBBS: Janet, what this is about is...

MURGUIA: ... on the air. You can try to divert this away from the hate and the representatives of vigilante groups, and you're standing with these vigilante groups. These are self-avowed vigilante groups. You're standing proudly by them.

You can try to sort of dismiss that, but the reality is, is we can't allow...

DOBBS: No, Janet, I'm dismissing...

MURGUIA: ... for hate speech to be part of this debate...

DOBBS: ... you know...

MURGUIA: ... or to control the network airwaves.

DOBBS: You know that as you speak right now, I have never spoken a hateful word against illegal immigrants.

MURGUIA: You have allowed these folks to have a microphone.

DOBBS: Excuse me.

MURGUIA: You've given hate a microphone by giving them time on this show.

DOBBS: Do we have -- since...

MURGUIA: And you've done it repeatedly. CNN...

DOBBS: OK, would you please put up...

MURGUIA: ... has done it repeatedly.

DOBBS: Oh, come on.

MURGUIA: And in the course of the last three years...

DOBBS: Crimes against Hispanics. Let's put that up. Hate crimes.

MURGUIA: ... the three cable networks have allowed these folks to have the airways...

DOBBS: Here's what you said.

MURGUIA: ... 110 times.

DOBBS: You said on your Web site, 23 percent increase in hate crimes. This is, according to the anti-Hispanic biased crimes in the Federal Bureau...

MURGUIA: According to the FBI and the Department of Justice, yes.

DOBBS: Please, look. In 2005, 522 incidents against Hispanics.

MURGUIA: It's increased by 23 percent in the past three years.

DOBBS: I'm just showing you what the FBI's showing us.

MURGUIA: And 50 percent in California alone.

DOBBS: To 576 against Hispanics...

MURGUIA: There is no coincidence between the extreme rhetoric that the debate has taken and a rise in hate crimes. Words have consequences. And our community is feeling the brunt of that.

DOBBS: Let me show you -- let me show you something.

MURGUIA: Any time you demonize a segment of our society...

DOBBS: No, you're trying to demonize me. And I'm going to show you the reality.

MURGUIA: This isn't about you, Lou. I know this is your...

DOBBS: You took me on and now you got me.

MURGUIA: It's not about -- it's about your networks. It's about your networks holding you and other networks...

DOBBS: I want you to...

MURGUIA: ... accountable.

DOBBS: Oh, please. You can't hold yourself accountable. How could you hold anyone else?

MURGUIA: We are here...

DOBBS: Could you please put this up?

MURGUIA: ... with the facts. Look at the Web site, making a very documented case on this.

DOBBS: Put up what I've said about illegal immigrants in this country, OK? If you would? We're waiting patiently.

MURGUIA: You know...

DOBBS: I think -- let's just go through this here.

MURGUIA: The white hate mail has gone from hate mail to death threats.

DOBBS: If you don't mind -- if you don't mind...

MURGUIA: You know...

DOBBS: By the way, I get a few death threats too. So Janet, you're not the Lone Ranger.

Here's -- may we -- would you do me the service, the kindness...

MURGUIA: I don't have a microphone every night.

DOBBS: Well, you're not going to have one very long here if you don't at least permit me to respond.

MURGUIA: Go ahead.

DOBBS: "I think I'm the only one on this panel" -- this is going back to May 15th, 2006 -- "who's actually worked with migrant workers in the fields, with beans, potatoes, hay in my youth. I know them to be good and decent people."

That was on Larry King.

MURGUIA: Who said that?

DOBBS: I said that. And by the way, I've said I respect illegal immigrants in this country dozens of times, but you don't seem to take note of that. Here's what I said on... MURGUIA: Not when you parade these individuals...

DOBBS: Excuse me, excuse me, excuse me...

MURGUIA: ... who are tied to hate groups and vigilantes...

DOBBS: Oh, come on.

MURGUIA: And when you embrace...

DOBBS: It isn't working, Janet.

MURGUIA: ... vigilante organizations...

DOBBS: We're going to finish this. And then I said...

MURGUIA: When you embrace vigilante organizations, that speaks for itself.

DOBBS: Oh, yes. Well, first of all, they're not a vigilante, they're a volunteer organization. And I think the president...

MURGUIA: Lou, they carry -- they believe in arming themselves.

DOBBS: By the way, it's the Second Amendment, do you believe in it?

MURGUIA: I believe in the Constitution.

DOBBS: They have a right to bear arms.

MURGUIA: But when they go after...

DOBBS: May we complete this?

MURGUIA: ... and hunt down undocumented immigrants -- how do they know who's undocumented...

DOBBS: "I have great respect for the people...

MURGUIA: ... and how do they know who's here legally?

DOBBS: ... who make up...

MURGUIA: You can't tell the difference.

DOBBS: Janet, Janet, just, please...

MURGUIA: They're tracking these folks down in stores...

DOBBS: Just listen. I want to save you as much embarrassment...

MURGUIA: ... not just on the border anymore.

DOBBS: ... as I can.

MURGUIA: Lou...

DOBBS: "I have great respect for the people who make up the preponderance of the illegal alien population in our country, that is Mexican migrant workers." On March 29th, 2006. To Jorge Ramos, who said, "I would love you to meet these illegals that you so called." OK?

I had to tell Jorge, Univision anchor -- unfortunately, partner, there's nothing to be gained here, because I worked with them, I know them, I respect them.

MURGUIA: You don't respect them when you trot out these individuals...

DOBBS: Oh, please.

MURGUIA: ... and when you embrace a vigilante organization.

DOBBS: No, no, you don't respect...

MURGUIA: You don't respect them, Lou, if you're going to continue to put these individuals on the air...

DOBBS: What you're basically saying is my words...

MURGUIA: ... who use this as a platform...

DOBBS: Only the words...

MURGUIA: ... for hate.

DOBBS: ... that you want to use are the ones you'll pay attention to.

MURGUIA: And they're tied to hate groups and vigilante groups.

DOBBS: You won't pay attention to the other words that I use. This broadcast has covered illegal immigration in this country and border security for six years. In that period of time, we have referred to disease three times.

You make a comment on your Web site, that I referred to invaders. You may find it intriguing -- referring to the illegal immigration population in this country -- you may find it intriguing, because we thought we'd go back and look. Invaders has been used six times on this broadcast.

MURGUIA: And we...

DOBBS: Do you know how many...

MURGUIA: You, Glenn Beck, Pat Buchanan -- you're not the only one...

DOBBS: Do you want to listen to what I'm saying?

MURGUIA: I am just making sure you understand...

DOBBS: No. Because I want you to understand...

MURGUIA: ... we documented every piece that you did on this...

DOBBS: But there is, as you say, accountability. And there is truth.

MURGUIA: That's right.

DOBBS: And the reality is it has been used six times on this broadcast. I used it once, and you have used it one-third of the times used on this broadcast.

MURGUIA: You've used these individuals 18 times...

DOBBS: The word "invader" fell from your mouth, not mine.

MURGUIA: You've used these individuals 18 times in the past two years.

DOBBS: Do you want to deal with what I'm saying?

MURGUIA: CNN has used them 48 times.

DOBBS: Or do you want to just keep...

MURGUIA: I'm making the case.

DOBBS: Try it.

MURGUIA: You've used them 18 times.

DOBBS: Invaders, six times.

MURGUIA: We document every time you've done that.

DOBBS: No, we document it. We don't pay attention to your documentation anymore.

MURGUIA: Well, it's hate speech. It's parroting...

DOBBS: Oh, it's hate speech?

MURGUIA: It's parroting hate speech.

DOBBS: OK. Let me tell you what...

MURGUIA: There's no room for hate in this debate.

DOBBS: You're not going to -- you're not...

MURGUIA: There's no room for hate.

DOBBS: There's no room for further distortion.

MURGUIA: We can have an honest policy discussion....

DOBBS: You will not distinguish...

MURGUIA: ... but we need to take hate out of the debate.

DOBBS: You can't have an honest policy discussion.

MURGUIA: We can have an honest policy discussion.

DOBBS: Let's try a couple of things and just see if we can agree on a couple of them, shall we? All right?

MURGUIA: Sure.

DOBBS: We need to secure our borders and our ports for the following reasons. For national security. And the war on terror. To win the war on drugs, because Mexico is the principal source of methamphetamines, heroin, cocaine and marijuana. And to stop illegal immigration. Can we agree?

MURGUIA: We can. This isn't about immigration, though. This is about hate speech and hate groups and vigilante groups, OK?

DOBBS: Oh, I understand. I understand. I know what it's about.

MURGUIA: So we can have...

DOBBS: It's pure political advocacy...

MURGUIA: ... a discussion about immigration policy.

DOBBS: It's fine.

MURGUIA: This isn't about immigration policy.

DOBBS: Do you want to try it?

MURGUIA: This is about hate speech and hate groups.

DOBBS: Do you want to try to go through the list?

MURGUIA: Of?

DOBBS: Of what we might agree on?

MURGUIA: We just talked about the need for comprehensive immigration reform.

DOBBS: And you dismissed it. Sure, if you want to talk about hate speech, let me tell you...

MURGUIA: We agree on the need for comprehensive immigration reform.

DOBBS: If you find -- even though the Congressional Budget Office itself declared that it would deal with only 25 percent of the problem of illegal immigration, would cost the country a fortune.

MURGUIA: What would? Dealing with...

DOBBS: Comprehensive immigration reform legislation that was declined (ph) in the United States Senate on June 28th, 2007.

MURGUIA: We can have -- we can have a separate discussion on immigration.

DOBBS: No, that's what the Congressional Budget...

MURGUIA: But don't dismiss this hate speech and the fact that these individuals that you parade and cloak with an air of respectability are identified and self-avowed vigilante organizations and hate groups.

DOBBS: OK.

MURGUIA: I mean, we can have a separate discussion about immigration. This is about keeping hate and hate speech out of the debate.

DOBBS: You said it wasn't about me. Now, is it about me or it isn't?

MURGUIA: It's about holding you accountable with your networks. And we did cite other networks, MSNBC and Fox.

DOBBS: I don't care about them. I don't care. I care about this broadcast...

MURGUIA: Well, we care about it, because...

DOBBS: ... and me.

MURGUIA: ... this repeated and relentless...

DOBBS: And I care about it because I believe you...

MURGUIA: ... use of these individuals to distort...

DOBBS: ... and your socio-ethnocentric interest group....

MURGUIA: ... immigrants -- oh please, Lou.

DOBBS: ... are trying to drive an agenda that has nothing...

MURGUIA: Ethnocentric -- we're a civil rights organization.

DOBBS: You're an ethnocentric organization...

MURGUIA: ... trying to level the playing field...

DOBBS: You're not trying to level anything.

MURGUIA: I'm as much of an ethnocentric organization as you are part of...

DOBBS: You're trying to...

MURGUIA: ... the media elite, a corporate conglomerate here on CNN.

DOBBS: Really?

MURGUIA: Yes.

DOBBS: I couldn't agree with you more.

MURGUIA: Well, OK. Embrace that title. I don't embrace your title that you've given me. We're a civil rights and advocacy organization...

DOBBS: You're going to have to (inaudible) something...

MURGUIA: ... with the record of creating opportunities...

DOBBS: You are now attacking me...

MURGUIA: ... for the Hispanics in this country.

DOBBS: You are attacking people for hate speech...

MURGUIA: We've opened the door for opportunities...

DOBBS: ... and I'm going to fight you with every resource I have, because you have stepped over the line. And you are trying to tear apart the First Amendment. You can't stomach the fact...

MURGUIA: Not at all.

DOBBS: ...that there are different opinions...

MURGUIA: Free speech is one thing; hate speech is another thing.

DOBBS: Should I ask for La Raza to be disbanded because you and I disagree about illegal immigration with me?

MURGUIA: I'm not trying to disband you.

DOBBS: Should you disband?

MURGUIA: I'm saying...

DOBBS: You said, take me out of my chair?

(CROSSTALK)

MURGUIA: If you don't...

DOBBS: If I don't conform to you and your standards.

MURGUIA: If you don't conform to standards that any American would embrace.

DOBBS: La Raza is now an advocacy group trying to drive amnesty for illegal aliens in this country...

MURGUIA: That's your opinion.

DOBBS: No, it's what you're doing.

MURGUIA: No, it's not.

DOBBS: OK, then you tell me. You don't want amnesty?

MURGUIA: We're here talking about hate speech.

DOBBS: You don't want amnesty?

MURGUIA: No.

DOBBS: OK.

MURGUIA: We're supporting...

DOBBS: Then we're good.

MURGUIA: We have supported taking deliberate steps to allow for an earned citizenship pathway for the folks who are here. We need to address the issue of immigration.

But today, Lou, this is about taking hate speech and representatives of hate groups...

DOBBS: No, you're trying to stifle speech.

MURGUIA: ... and vigilante...

DOBBS: You're trying to stifle speech.

MURGUIA: Absolutely not. There is a line that has been crossed...

DOBBS: And you know...

MURGUIA: ... and we know when that line is crossed, Lou...

DOBBS: You do.

MURGUIA: We've seen it crossed before.

DOBBS: You are now the standard bearer for truth and free speech in this country?

MURGUIA: We need to hold networks accountable.

DOBBS: I thought you were a civil rights -- you need to hold yourself accountable.

MURGUIA: As a civil rights organization...

DOBBS: You've got half the Hispanic kids in this country almost dropping out of high school.

MURGUIA: And we can work on agendas to help...

DOBBS: You are -- and you're going -- and what are you doing?

MURGUIA: ... address that, but we can't, because every day we're tarred and feathered...

DOBBS: What you are doing -- you're working on illegal immigration...

MURGUIA: ... with this issue, and you contribute to that.

DOBBS: Janet Murguia, you have contributed to, to me, just a reprehensible approach on the part of any organization. You've joined the Southern Poverty Law Center, which is now nothing more than an advocacy and fund-raising organization. I think you are the one who should be held accountable.

MURGUIA: We are going to hold you accountable with the networks and we're going to hold...

DOBBS: And we're going to hold you accountable as well.

MURGUIA: ... Glenn Beck accountable, we're going to hold...

DOBBS: You can hold everybody accountable.

MURGUIA: ... all those individuals who...

DOBBS: The reality is, you can't stand the fact that we have free speech in this country, that you can be opposed and opposed effectively...

MURGUIA: Free speech is one thing...

DOBBS: ... by people who care about reason...

MURGUIA: ... hate speech is another, Lou.

DOBBS: ... in this country. Oh, come on.

MURGUIA: We won't tolerate hate speech.

DOBBS: You won't tolerate it?

MURGUIA: That's right.

DOBBS: Neither will I.

MURGUIA: OK.

DOBBS: Thank you very much. MURGUIA: Thanks.

DOBBS: Janet Murguia.

Still ahead, three top political analysts join me. We'll have the latest on the presidential campaign. Stay with us and I just want to say, Janet Murguia, you're welcome back any time to continue this discussion. Anyone who wants to advocate on the basis -- we delight in having you here.

MURGUIA: Thank you.

 

 

 

 
What is RSS? | We Can Stop The Hate
Recursos en Espa–ol
TAKE THE HATE OUT OF THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE

What is RSS?

RSS (Rich Site Summary) a format for delivering regularly changing web content. Many news-related sites, weblogs and other online publishers syndicate their content as an RSS Feed to whoever wants it.

Why Use RSS?

RSS Feeds allow you to stay informed by retrieving content from the websites you are interested in and help save time since you don't have to visit each site individually. The number of sites offering RSS feeds is very large and growing constantly, and most majoy news websites now offer onr or more RSS feeds

How do I use an RSS Feed?

An RSS Feed Reader or News Aggregator allows you to subscribe to RSS feeds from various sites and display them for you to read.

There are a number of different RSS Readers are available on Mac, Windows, and Linux. There are also several web-based RSS Feed readers such as My Yahoo, Bloglines, and Google Reader.

Once you have an RSS Feed Reader, it is a matter of finding sites that syndicate content and adding their RSS feed to the list of feeds your Feed Reader checks. Many sites display a small icon with the acronyms RSS, XML, or RDF to let you know a feed is available.

 
The Details | We Can Stop The Hate
Recursos en Espa–ol
TAKE THE HATE OUT OF THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE

The Details

Code Words of Hate

Virtually every large-scale civil rights atrocity in U.S. history was preceded by a widespread campaign vilifying a specific ethnic or religious group, and Latinos are only the most recent victims.  Learn more about the code words of hate used in today’s campaign.


Hate Flashpoints

The most recent Federal Bureau of Investigation Hate Crime Statistics report shows a significant increase in hate crimes committed against Latinos in the United States between 2004 and 2006. Learn more by reading cited examples of the steady growth of anti-Hispanic hate crimes since 2004.


Hate and Extremist Groups

Learn more about the groups identified by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) and others as hate or extremist groups that are at the forefront of the hate speech directed toward Hispanics in the U.S.


Suspect Spokespeople

Spokespeople for these hate and extremist groups have appeared—often unopposed or unchallenged—on national news programs.  Find out more about these spokespeople and where they appear in the media.


Media Malpractice

Some mainstream national news outlets, especially among the cable news networks, have provided highly visible platforms to representatives of the hate and extremist groups noted on this site.  Find out more about this media malpractice and the journalists who serve as anti-immigrant activists


Myths vs. Facts

Learn more about the myths and facts surrounding the immigration debate.

 
What You Can Do | We Can Stop The Hate
Recursos en Espa–ol
TAKE THE HATE OUT OF THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE

What You Can Do

Take one minute against hate:

Take five minutes to learn more and spread the word about:

  • America’s Immigration Legacy.  Watch the video and learn about our nation’s experience with previous immigrants and our treatment of those communities.  Forward the link to your friends.
  • Suspect spokespeople.  Watch the video to learn from the Southern Poverty Law Center about hate groups and vigilantes who have infiltrated the immigration debate.  Forward the link to your friends.
  • The role of the media in parroting hate speak.  Watch MediaMatters' video for a look at cable news network shows that provide over-the-top and often inaccurate information about immigration.  Forward the link to your friends.

Take ten minutes to learn more about how hate and intolerance are being advanced:

  • Watch The Code Words of Hate to identify the words and messages used to demonize Hispanic immigrants and communities perceived to be immigrant.
  • Download the companion document, "Code Words in the Debate."
  • Watch "Behind the Veil" to trace the connections between many of the anti-immigrant groups and their ties to White supremacy and hate.
  • Learn more about these connections with the help of Campaign for a United America’s FAIR Family Tree, a tool to help journalists, elected officials, and civic and labor leaders understand anti-immigrant networks in the United States.

Get involved.



Download We Can Stop The Hate:  A Tool Kit for Action to learn how to implement this campaign in your community and monitor your local media’s coverage of immigration.

 
Why This Matters | We Can Stop The Hate
Recursos en Espa–ol
TAKE THE HATE OUT OF THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE

Why This Matters

The National Council of La Raza (NCLR) launched the Wave of Hope campaign to stem the surge of hate and violence that has surrounded the immigration debate.  The rhetoric of hate groups, nativists, and vigilantes—once limited to the fringe of American politics—has gained a strong foothold in the public debate.  Their policy positions frame the country’s political discourse, and their members have penetrated the mainstream media.  In short, extremists are defining the debate on immigration—and the portrayal of Hispanic Americans—at every level. NCLR, which hosts this site, believes strongly in the values of this nation, in pluralism, and in the ability of every American to share the rights and responsibilities of this great country.  We also believe that hate has detrimental consequences for both policymaking and America’s values, undermining the strength and integrity of our country.  The time has come to take hate out of the debate.  Immigration is a serious issue requiring a reasoned and thoughtful debate.

View the videos below to learn more.




Want more information?  Find it here: The Details

 
Basura Televisada | We Can Stop The Hate
Recursos en Espa–ol
TAKE THE HATE OUT OF THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE

Basura Televisada

"Basura Televisa" publicada en La Opinion el 11 de febrero del 2008

 
PODEMOS DETENER EL ODIO PETICIÓN A LOS MEDIOS SAQUEN A LOS EXTREMISTAS DEL DEBATE | We Can Stop The Hate
Recursos en Espa–ol
TAKE THE HATE OUT OF THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE

PODEMOS DETENER EL ODIO PETICIÓN A LOS MEDIOS SAQUEN A LOS EXTREMISTAS DEL DEBATE

UNA PETICIÓN PARA:

Sr. Jim Walton
Presidente
CNN Worldwide1
CNN Center
Atlanta, GA 30303

Roger Ailes
Jefe del consejo y Director General
Fox News Corporation
1211 Aveue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036

Phil Griffin
Ejecutivo a cargo
MSNBC
30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10112

 

Con regularidad, los noticieros tales como Lou Dobbs Tonight, The O'Reilly Factor y MSNBC News Live, ofrecen plataformas nacionales para portavoces que representan conocidos grupos vigilantes y racistas -como Jim Gilchrist y Chris Simcox del Proyecto Minuteman y Dan Stein de la Federación para la Reforma de Inmigración en Estados Unidos (FAIR por sus siglas en inglés). Estos portavoces aparecen regularmente en cadenas de televisión como "comentaristas especializados" o como expertos antes-inmigración. Raras veces se reconoce o cuestiona su prestigio como representantes del odio o de un grupo vigilante. Raras veces se enfrentan a alguien con un punto de vista opuesto. Un estudio superficial del listado de la programación de las cadenas de televisión muestra que, en los últimos tres años, estos tres sólo han aparecido por lo menos 110 veces en la programación. Y hay muchos otros más en la programación, que tienen fuertes lazos con grupos extremistas.

Nuestro agotado sistema de inmigración, es un asunto político muy serio para aquellos estadounidenses verdaderamente preocupados por encontrar una solución. Seamos claros: no creemos que cualquiera que esté preocupado por tener una frontera segura es perteneciente a  un grupo racista. Pero, es inadecuado y ofensivo que las cadenas de televisión proporcionen un micrófono a individuos u organizaciones que propagan y diseminan el vigilantísimo, la supremacía blanca y la violencia en el debate sobre la inmigración. No hay excusa para que los presentadores y productotes de los programas de entrevistas y comentaristas, para no investigar adecuadamente los antecedentes y la postura de sus invitados ante el asunto de la inmigración.

Considere a los tres portavoces mencionados arriba, a quienes su cadena de televisión les ha permitido difundir su mensaje de odio:
  • Chris Simcox, quien aparece por lo menos siete veces en CNN, 13 veces en Fox News Channel, cuatro veces en MSNBC, fue condenado en el 2003 por portar un arma en un parque nacional mientras buscaba a inmigrantes ilegales.
  • Ese año, fue citado textualmente diciendo: "Hasta ahora, hemos tenido moderación, pero me temo que esa moderación se ha agotado. Prestemos atención a nuestras armas porque vamos a defender nuestra frontera como sea necesario".
  • Dan Stein, quien aparece por lo menos 18 veces en  CNN, dos veces en Fox News Channel y ocho veces en MSNBC, ha advertido que ciertos grupos de inmigrantes están metidos en la "carrera reproductiva" con el propósito de disminuir el poderío blanco.
  • Jim Gilchrist, quien aparece por lo menos 12 veces en CNN, 11 veces en Fox News Channel y ocho veces en MSNBC dijo, "Los inmigrantes ilegales destruirán este país. Cada vez que una bandera mexicana se planta en tierra estadounidense, es una declaración de guerra".

Los noticieros nocturnos, comúnmente están llenos de portavoces que propaguen el vigilantísimo y el miedo. Con frecuencia hablan en código, llamándolos "criminales", "un ejército de invasores" y "una horda masiva que trae enfermedad", y se refieren a los niños nacidos de los inmigrantes como "anclas" (anchor babies). Es igualmente deplorable como muchos comentaristas y presentadores de los programas de entrevistas, repitan como loros estos insultos y amenazas racistas en sus transmisiones.

Los insultos y amenazas racistas van dirigidos a los hispanos, asiáticos y a otros en los Estados Unidos, incluyendo a trabajadores ciudadanos estadounidenses y residentes legales. El FBI reporta que, en los últimos tres años a nivel nacional, los crímenes por odio hacia los latinos llegan hasta el 23% y se han duplicado en California. El Centro de Leyes de la Pobreza del Sur y la Liga Anti-difamación han documentado docenas de ataques físicos a los latinos, la mayoría ciudadanos estadounidenses, por gente que predica retórica anta-inmigrante. Desafortunadamente, muchos más crímenes como estos pasan desapercibidos.

Por lo tanto, el/la que suscribe exhorta a que saquen a tales "comentaristas especializados" del aire.  Y más allá los exhortamos para que se aseguren de que sus presentadores de programas de entrevistas y sus comentaristas, se abstengan de usar palabras de racismo en código. No se debe tolerar tal retórica. Los insultos y amenazas racistas no tienen lugar en las cadenas de televisión. Asuntos tales como la inmigración pueden explorarse de manera legítima y a fondo, sin deshumanizar a un grupo entero de gente.

Gracias por su atención a este asunto tan urgente.

Firmado,

 


 

Ésta petición que usted acaba de leer se enviará en inglés a los ejecutivos de las cadenas de televisión mencionados. Para continuar el proceso, por favor oprima AQUÍ y complete la información requerida. Una vez complete sus datos, ésta carta será enviada vía correo electrónico a las cadenas de televisión CNN, Fox, y MSNBC. Muchas gracias. 

 
Recursos en Español | We Can Stop The Hate
Recursos en Espa–ol
TAKE THE HATE OUT OF THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE

Recursos en Español

En respuesta al auge en palabras incitadas por el odio y la violencia en relación al debate migratorio, el Consejo Nacional de La Raza (NCLR, por sus siglas en inglés) - la organización nacional más grande de apoyo y defensa de derechos civiles de hispanos en Estados Unidos- lanzó una campaña para erradicar el odio e hizo un llamado a los candidatos presidenciales y las estaciones de radio y televisión para que se distancien de los grupos extremistas y para que dejen de patrocinar la retórica de odio y desprecio hacia los inmigrantes y latinos en los medios de comunicación.


Actualmente NCLR está solicitando que los ciudadanos envíen cartas de petición a las cadenas de televisión que patrocinan a grupos extremistas para exigirle a éstas que eviten el patrocinio de grupos extremistas y la transmisión de mensajes de odio y discriminación en contra de nuestra comunidad. PODEMOS DETENER EL ODIO PETICIÓN A LOS MEDIOS SAQUEN A LOS EXTREMISTAS DEL DEBATE

 
AJC Appeals to Cable TV Executives to End Airing of Anti-Immigrant Hate | We Can Stop The Hate
Recursos en Espa–ol
TAKE THE HATE OUT OF THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE

AJC Appeals to Cable TV Executives to End Airing of Anti-Immigrant Hate

AJC Appeals to Cable TV Executives to End Airing of Anti-Immigrant Hate

February 15, 2008 - New York - The American Jewish Committee is urging the heads of major cable television networks to ensure that the background of certain so-called immigration experts appearing on news shows is revealed to the viewing audience.

"It is inappropriate and offensive for major television programs to provide a microphone to individuals and organizations that promote hate, espouse vigilantism, white supremacy, or even violence in the immigration debate," AJC General Counsel Jeffrey Sinensky wrote in a letter to the heads of CNN, FOX and MSNBC.

"There is no excuse for television talk show hosts and commentators failing to investigate the backgrounds of the people they invite on their shows to speak on the issue of immigration."

The AJC letter was delivered today to Jim Walton, president of CNN Worldwide; Roger Ailes, chairman and CEO of FOX News Corporation; and Phil Griffin, executive-in-charge of MSNBC. AJC has partnered with the National Council of La Raza and its "We Can Stop the Hate" campaign launched recently to counter the increasing rhetoric on the airwaves that already has caused a rise in hate crimes against Latinos.

AJC pointed out specifically that Lou Dobbs Tonight, The O'Reilly Factor, and MSNBC News Live offer national platforms to spokespeople who represent known vigilante or hate-promoting groups, including Jim Gilchrist and Chris Simcox of the Minuteman Project and Dan Stein of the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR). 

They regularly appear on news programs as anti-immigration "expert commentators" and pundits.  "Rarely is their status as a representative of a vigilante group or one that promotes hate acknowledged or challenged. Rarely do they face anyone with an opposing viewpoint," said Sinensky.

In addition, the AJC letter noted that spokespeople espousing vigilantism and fear regularly appear on nightly news programs. They often speak in code, calling immigrants "criminals," "an army of invaders," and "diseased"; and children born to immigrants are referred to as "anchor babies."  Many talk show hosts and commentators parrot this hate speech on their broadcasts.

"Hate speech has no legitimate role in the media. History has shown repeatedly that it can be the precursor to violence," said Sinensky. "Issues such as immigration can be explored legitimately and thoroughly without demonizing an entire group of people."

AJC, the oldest human relations organization in the U.S., has been a longstanding advocate for fair and open immigration, and a strong supporter of comprehensive immigration reform.

 
Donate Now | We Can Stop The Hate
Recursos en Espa–ol
TAKE THE HATE OUT OF THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE

Donate Now

We Can Stop The Hate's Donation Tool is Coming Soon...

Please help us expose and stop the distorted, hateful messages about immigrants and Hispanics circulating in the news media. To aid in the fight now, visit NCLR's contribution page. Be sure to tell them in the "Feedback" section that you are an ally of the We Can Stop The Hate campaign.

 
FAIR: Immigration and Welfare | We Can Stop The Hate
Recursos en Espa–ol
TAKE THE HATE OUT OF THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE

FAIR: Immigration and Welfare

Although the United States' welfare rolls are already swollen, every year we import more people who wind up on public assistance: immigrants. Many immigrants are poor; indeed, that is why they come here. The immigrants we admit are much poorer than the native population and are increasing the size of our impoverished population. As a result, the share of immigrant households below the poverty line (18 percent) is much higher than the share of native households that are poor (11 percent)-nearly twice as high. And immigrant households are more likely to participate in practically every one of the major means-tested programs. Immigrant use of welfare programs (21 percent) is 43 percent higher than non-immigrants' use (15 percent).1

Each year, state governments spend an estimated $11 billion to $22 billion to provide welfare to immigrants.2

Why Are Immigrants On Welfare?
Some people mistakenly think that immigrants are not eligible for welfare. Several years ago, Congress did attempt to render immigrants ineligible for most forms of welfare. However, subsequent backpedaling by Congress and the executive branch has undone most of those reforms. Furthermore, many immigrant families get welfare through the eligibility of their U.S. citizen children. (It is also important to realize that even when immigrants are ineligible for federal welfare programs, the burden of their support is simply shifted over to the state and local welfare agencies.)

Refugees, asylees, and all amnestied illegal aliens are exempt from the public charge requirement.3 Congress has decided that the American people will serve as the sponsors for these immigrants and pick up the tab for their support.

All other immigrants must pass a public charge test and have a U.S. sponsor or sponsors willing to pledge their income to support them. Before a potential immigrant receives an immigration visa, American consular officers are supposed to evaluate whether he or she is likely to become a public charge, and, if so, to deny the visa. The consular officer is supposed to take into account a variety of factors: the amount of support the sponsor can give, the resources and skills of the applicant, and any special conditions (such as age or infirmity) that might affect the applicant's need for support. The Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 set the new legal standard for the evaluation: the sponsor of the applicant must have an annual income of at least 125 percent of the federally designated poverty level. There are several problems with this standard:

The sponsorship income level, only 25 percent higher than the poverty level, is so low that it does not prevent immigrants from going on welfare; in fact, it almost guarantees it. Say a sponsor begins with an income of 200 percent of poverty level and is, therefore, not considered "legally poor." But after splitting that income with the immigrant, each will be at 100 percent of the poverty level. Where before we had one non-poor person, now we have two poor people. Since eligibility for some welfare programs kicks in before one's income drops to 125 percent of poverty level, immigrants can easily wind up on welfare.
While immigrants who receive welfare can be deported for violating the conditions under which they were admitted, this provision is rarely enforced; in fact, only twelve people have been deported under this provision since 1980.4 Administrative rulings have held that an immigrant cannot be held responsible for receiving welfare unless the welfare agencies have sent the immigrant a bill for their services, demanded payment, and been refused payment.5 Since welfare agencies do not do this, it is virtually impossible for an immigrant to be charged with violating the public charge provisions that can lead to deportation.

Furthermore, numerous forms of welfare are not considered under the public charge test, including food stamps, pre-natal care, nutrition programs, housing assistance, energy assistance, job training programs, child care services, free or reduced school lunch, public shelters, health clinics, Medicaid, and any cash welfare programs that are not the family's sole source of income.6 This insulates immigrants from being considered public charges unless they are completely dependent on welfare.
What Types of Welfare Are Immigrants Eligible For?
As of the 1996 welfare reform bill, the following applies to eligibility for federal and state funded welfare programs:

Legal immigrants are barred from all federal means-tested public benefits for five years after entering the country and barred from SSI and food stamps until citizenship. They are also barred from all federal means-tested public benefits for five years.7
Benefits available to immigrants include school lunch and breakfast programs, immunizations, emergency medical services, disaster relief, and others programs that are necessary to protect life and safety as identified by the attorney general, regardless of immigration status.8
Illegal immigrants are barred from the following federal public benefits: grants, contracts, loans, licenses, retirement, welfare, health, disability, public or assisted housing, post secondary education, food assistance, and unemployment benefits. States are barred from providing state or locally funded benefits to illegal immigrants unless a state law is enacted granting such authority.9
Welfare Reform Failed to Solve the Problem
Despite expectations that the 1996 welfare reform bill would cause significant changes in immigrant welfare use, it has actually remained at the same level. The 1996 welfare reforms failed because while the legislation cut immigrants off from certain welfare programs, the savings that resulted from those cuts were not high enough to offset the increased usage of the remaining programs, due to the continuing high number of immigrants entering the U.S. every year.

While both Temporary Aid to Needy Families (TANF) and food stamp use have declined by four percent, the decline did not result in any significant savings, as those costs were offset by increases in Medicaid use, which has increased among immigrant households. The total combined value of benefits and payments received by immigrant households from welfare programs remained almost the same, averaging almost $2,000 in 2001, about 50 percent higher than natives. Such high rates of immigrant welfare use, combined with the rapidly increasing immigrant population, has resulted in a four percent increase in the number of immigrant households on welfare, from 14 percent in 1996 to 18 percent in 2000.10

Outlook for the Future
The highest welfare use rates for immigrants are in New York (30 percent), California (28 percent), Massachusetts (25 percent), and Texas (25 percent).12
Immigrants are eleven percent of our population, but they are 20 percent of the poor population. Unless our immigration policies are reevaluated and changed accordingly, welfare usage and subsequent costs will remain high.

Instead of addressing the problem, some in Congress have suggested measures that would make it even worse, such as proposals to increase immigrants' eligibility for benefits. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that making legal immigrants eligible for Medicaid and the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) would cost an estimated $2.24 billion over ten years.11

If we are to have any hope of reducing poverty in the U.S., our immigration laws must be revised and returned to the sensible practice of excluding aliens who are likely to become public charges and to deport those who do.

Table DP-1-4, Profile of General Demographic Characteristics: 1990 and 2000, Census 2000, U.S. Census Bureau.
Steven A. Camarota, "Back Where We Started: An Examination of Trends in Immigrant Welfare Use Since Welfare Reform," Center for Immigration Studies, March 2003.
Immigration and Nationality Act § 102 [8 U.S.C. 1102].
Immigration and Nationality Act § 237A(5).
Matter of B-, 3 I.&N.Dec.323 (AG and BIA 1948).
Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 § 110.
Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 § 411. Exceptions include refugees, asylees, those granted withholding of deportation for their first five years in the U.S., veterans, active duty military, and their spouses and dependents. After the five-year bar on federal benefits, states may offer Medicaid, federal cash (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - TANF) assistance , and services under the SSBG if deeming provisions are applied.

Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 § 432.
Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 § 401.
Camarota, op. cit.
"Graham Faults Administration for Shortsighted Health Care Policy," press release, U.S. Senator Bob Graham, May 1, 2003.
Camarota, op.cit.

 

 
USA Today: Fee Increase Could Curb Citizenship Applications | We Can Stop The Hate
Recursos en Espa–ol
TAKE THE HATE OUT OF THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE

USA Today: Fee Increase Could Curb Citizenship Applications

Updated 3/1/2007 12:17 PM ET
By William M. Welch, USA TODAY

Construction worker Martin Delgado paid $845 to the U.S. government to have the chance for his wife and children join him as citizens in Arizona.
Under a proposed set of fee increases, Delgado would have had to pay nearly three times as much, or $2,595. The Tucson resident said citizenship for his family is worth the higher price.

"I'm willing to sacrifice to give my family the opportunity to live here legally," says Delgado, 41, a native of Mexico who has worked in the USA since 2000.

RELATED: White House renews effort to overhaul laws

The Citizenship and Immigration Service says the fee hikes will allow it to hire more staff and upgrade its creaky system so applications can be approved faster. Among its proposals is to raise the application fee for citizenship from $330 to $595 and the fee for legal permanent residency from $325 to $905.

Advocates for immigrants say the cost may price out the poor from becoming citizens.

Patricia Mejia, a Tucson immigration attorney, calls the increases "frightening."

"I've never seen an increase like that. It's outrageous," she says.

Emilio Gonzalez, director of the Citizenship and Immigration Service, says he knows some people may have to save more to become U.S. citizens. But Gonzalez says most people seeking residency here are, like the Delgados, able to afford the higher fees and consider their families worth the price.

According to agency records, the vast majority of people who apply for the required first step of permanent legal residency (commonly referred to as having a "green card") have jobs in the USA or are joining their spouses or parents as citizens.

In 2005, 1.1 million people received legal permanent resident status. Of those:

•649,000 are applications to unify with family members

•220,000 were people working and seeking entry based on their professions, job skills, or because they had jobs considered a priority by the U.S. government.

Of those, 134,861 had jobs in management or similar positions.

•160,000 people had sales, service, farming or similar jobs.

"This is a user fee, and the people benefiting from the service should be the ones to foot the bill," says Ira Mehlman, spokesman for the Federation for American Immigration Reform in Los Angeles.

Mehlman's group, which seeks to improve border security and reduce immigration levels to about 300,000 people a year, says the proposed new fees are still a bargain for U.S. residency. "When you compare value to cost, it is fairly insignificant," he says.

Covering agency costs

The fee for the most commonly filed application, permanent residency or "green card," will increase $580 under Gonzalez's proposal. Other fees will be reduced and some will rise even more.

The fee for an investor (someone who qualifies as having the means to create jobs) seeking a green card would go from $475 to $2,850. About 45 applications a year fall in that category, says Rendell Jones, chief financial officer of the agency.

Gonzalez says the impact of the proposed increase for a green card is not as steep as it sounds.

He says under the current system, many people periodically pay $180 for work permits while waiting for permanent residency. Under the proposed fee structure, those work permit fees will disappear, Gonzalez said.

The law makes provision for fees to be waived in some cases, and 6% of green cards are granted without fee, according to the agency. Most waivers are for refugees and those seeking political asylum.

All of the fee increases proposed are undergoing a 60-day period of public comment. That ends April 2. And if all goes as planned, Gonzalez says he hopes the agency can implement the fees in June. "Any time you raise fees, it's going to affect people. That's a given," he says. Even so, higher fees are "something we feel is not onerous," especially given what the money will do.

The Citizenship and Immigration Service gets its entire budget from its fees. The increases will add an estimated $1 billion a year to its annual budget of close to $2 billion, says Michael Aytes, associate director for operations.

Aytes says higher fees will allow the agency to digitize applications and hopefully reduce waiting times for applicants by 20% by 2009.

"It's far more important that we charge a fee to cover the necessary cost of processing cases in the right way, in the right amount of time, than to lowball fees" and have poorer services, Aytes says.

Long waits, system glitches

Wait times for processing average six months. The agency says applicants sometimes complain that they become lost in the system. That happened to the Delgados, whose original applications were lost by the agency and had to be refiled, says Mejia, their lawyer.

Some in Congress such as Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., chairwoman of a House Judiciary subcommittee on immigration, questions whether the fee increases will prevent impoverished people from trying to become Americans.

The agency says it grants waivers to those who can show they can't afford to pay fees. But to get a green card, immigrants must make enough income to support themselves or have a financial sponsor. Pleading poverty to get a fee waiver could make one ineligible.

Gonzalez admitted "there is an inconsistency" in the policy. Mejia said people who can't pay the higher costs may choose to do something both sides of the debate dislike: remain in the country illegally.

Delgado, who brought carpentry skills with him from Mexico, makes about $32,000 a year and considers himself fortunate to have a job that allows him to bring his family here. As good a life is not possible where he is from, he says. He, his wife Ana Maria, and their sons Daniel, 11, and Luis, 13, are all here from Mexico under temporary permits.

For him, almost no price seems too high to pay.

"It's something I'm willing to do because it will give my family more stability, more opportunities here in the United States," Delgado says.

 

 
Correction | We Can Stop The Hate
Recursos en Espa–ol
TAKE THE HATE OUT OF THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE

Correction

The statistics included in graphics that Janet Murguía presented on Lou Dobbs’ program, February 4, 2008, were not accurately reproduced from the materials sent to CNN in late January by the National Council of La Raza (NCLR).  NCLR regrets the error, which in one case overstated the appearance of hate groups on CNN and, in other cases, understated it.  The corrected graphics are available below.

The figures used in NCLR’s study of spokespeople from hate groups and extremist organizations appearing on network cable news programming and on CNN should have been stated as follows:

  • Chris Simcox has appeared on Lou Dobbs Tonight three (3) times and at least seven (7) times on CNN. (The graphic cited four (4) and seven (7) appearances, respectively.)
  • Jim Gilchrist has appeared on Lou Dobbs Tonight five (5) times and at least 12 times on CNN.  (The graphic cited eight (8) and 27 appearances, respectively.)
  • Dan Stein has appeared on Lou Dobbs Tonight seven (7) times and at least 18 times on CNN.  (The graphic cited six (6) and 14 appearances, respectively.)

Download Chris Simcox graphic
Download Jim Gilchrist graphic
Download Dan Stein graphic
Download Lou Dobbs' quote

 
WeCanStopTheHate.org RSS Feeds | We Can Stop The Hate
Recursos en Espa–ol
TAKE THE HATE OUT OF THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE

WeCanStopTheHate.org RSS Feeds

Below are the RSS feeds we currently offer to syndicate our content:

What is RSS?
 
Media Center | We Can Stop The Hate
Recursos en Espa–ol
TAKE THE HATE OUT OF THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE

Media Center


Resources for the Media

Immigration Quick Fact Sheets 



Office of Media Relations

The National Council of La Raza (NCLR) strengthens its capacity-building assistance to Hispanic community-based organizations (CBOs) and its research, policy analysis, and advocacy efforts through its Office of Media Relations (OMR). This eight-person bilingual team works to maximize accurate and responsible news coverage of issues of concern to the U.S. Latino community and advance the mission of NCLR

During the last decade, NCLR's visibility and prominence have grown significantly as a result of OMR's work. The NCLR Annual Conference receives important press coverage and is an integral part of the U.S. Latino calendar of events. The press office also promotes and disseminates NCLR's publications, such as research and policy papers, training materials, statistical analyses, fact sheets, and issue briefs to the media and public. OMR also hosts numerous press conferences and public events throughout the year to raise awareness of issues that are important to Hispanics and to promote NCLR's advocacy and programmatic agendas.

In addition to responding to significant inquiries from the media, OMR reviews and edits content for the NCLR website, oversees quality control and in-house design and desktop publishing, and provides support for other public information activity, including public service announcements in the Spanish-speaking community. NCLR has an extensive media database, reflecting contacts from throughout the country and abroad in mainstream and specialized outlets (TV, print, radio, and news services) in English and Spanish. One of OMR's principal media tactics is the use of e-blasts to communicate information. E-blasts can reach up to 2,500 recipients, depending on the target audience.


NCLR Office of Media Relations Contacts

  • Lisa Navarrete, Vice President
    E-mail: (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
    Phone: (202) 785-1670
  • Marie Watteau, Director of Media Relations
    E-mail: (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
    Phone: (202) 785-1670

Allies

Anti-Defamation League (DC Regional Office)
E-mail: (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
Phone: (202) 452-8310
Fax: (202) 296-2371

Center for American Progress
1333 H Street NW, 10th Floor
Washington, D.C. 20005
Phone: (202) 682-1611
E-mail: (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

  • Henry Fernandez, Senior Fellow
    E-mail: (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
  • Sean Gibbons, Director of Media Strategy
    E-mail: (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
    Phone: (202) 682-1611
  • John Neurohr, Press Assistant
    E-mail: (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
    Phone: (202) 481-8182
  • Erin Lindsay, Online Marketing Manager
    E-mail: (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
    Phone: (202) 741-6397

Leadership Conference on Civil Rights (LCCR)
https://www.civilrights.org
Phone: (202) 466-3311

  • Mistique Cano, Press Secretary
    E-mail: (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
    Phone: (202) 263-2882
  • Rob Randhava, Counsel
    E-mail: (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
    Phone: (202) 466-6058
     

Media Matters for America
https://www.mediamatters.org
Phone: (202) 756-4100

Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC)
https://www.splcenter.org
Phone: (334) 956-8200

  • Mark Potok, Director, Intelligence Project
    E-mail: (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
  • Heidi Beirich, Director, Research and Special Projects
    E-mail: (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

 


Download transcripts of President Janet Murguía's past speeches



Download NCLR Press Releases

 


Download NCLR Publications

 
Code Words of Hate | We Can Stop The Hate
Recursos en Espa–ol
TAKE THE HATE OUT OF THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE

Code Words of Hate

When people acting as “experts” or “commentators” on the immigration debate demonize Latino immigrants, either legal or illegal, as a dangerous threat to American society or as subhuman and inherently inferior, they follow a tragic historical pattern which, time and again, has led to extreme civil rights abuses in American history.

Such labels are used to justify extreme action, sometimes even genocide, since the people using those labels claim that the “larger public interest” is at risk.  Further, if a group is widely accepted as “inhuman” or “inferior,” it allows the rest of society to suspend its normal standards of right and wrong in judging actions taken against the target group.


Race and Ethnicity
A remarkable number of commentators on immigration make explicitly race-based appeals, often accompanied by ethnic slurs or stereotypes.* One of the bolder articulators of these views was the late Samuel Francis, a writer for the anti-immigrant journal, The Social Contract, who was fired by the Washington Times in part for suggesting...  Read more

 

War and Invasion
It is increasingly common for mainstream commentators to refer to the current immigration phenomenon as a "war" in which the U.S. is being "invaded." For example, frequent television commentator Pat Buchanan said on Fox News recently...  Read more

Conquest
A variant of this militaristic theme are references to "La Reconquista," an antiquated metaphor used by Chicano scholars in the 1960s to refer to a mythical "Aztlán," in the Southwest. Although it is difficult to find anyone in the Latino community outside of a few student groups or fringe groups that have ever espoused this idea, it appears to be gaining far more attention and notoriety in the context of the current immigration debate than it ever did as a scholarly doctrine.*  Read more

Disease
As ADL notes, references to Latino immigrants riddled with dangerous diseases are frequent. For example, on November 23, 2007, Michelle Dallacroce posted a video on the "Mothers Against Illegal Aliens" website, noting... Read more 

Criminality
Many commentators inaccurately suggest that immigrants in general, and Latino immigrants in particular, have a higher proclivity to commit crime.* CNN's Glenn Beck suggests that Mexicans come from an inherently lawless culture... Read more 

Economics and Welfare
There are numerous references in the debate to allegations that immigrants "steal jobs" from Americans and create other adverse economic* NCLR's review found numerous references to immigrants as criminals, including terms such as "flotsam and jetsam that seeks to float into our territory," "lawlessness and chaos"... Read more 


 

See code words of hate used against Latinos in the immigration debate

See which spokespeople and hate and extremist groups are using them

See which networks are complicit in providing airtime to hate groups and vigilantes

Learn about hate crimes against Latinos

 

 
Myths v. Facts | We Can Stop The Hate
Recursos en Espa–ol
TAKE THE HATE OUT OF THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE

Myths v. Facts

Additional resources for more information on immigration:

Five Facts about Undocumented Workers in the United States

The strong presence of undocumented workers in the U.S. labor force illustrates the imbalance between the nation's immigration system and current economic realities. This fact sheet challenges some common myths about undocumented workers.

TOP 5 IMMIGRATION MYTHS OF THIS CAMPAIGN SEASON:
Ending the Immigration Spin - Just the Facts
(This document is reprinted courtesy of the American Immigration Lawyers Association)

Immigration has already figured prominently in the Presidential primary campaigns and the issue is unlikely to fade from the limelight any time soon. Debates over immigration policy have always generated strong emotional reactions, but the intensity surrounding the current national debate has reached new levels. The rhetoric by some of the Presidential candidates and their supporters has moved from hyperbole to unbridled misrepresentation.

The American public is justifiably angry about undocumented immigration and the Federal government's failure to gain control over our borders. But if we ever hope to adopt a practical policy solution that restores the rule of law and advances the interests of our nation, we must untangle fact from fiction. Perpetuating myths and exploiting fears to drive policy are two sure-fire ways to make a bad situation worse.

As the campaign season rolls onward and the intensity of the debate escalates, five recurring myths must be dispelled to clear the way for honest dialogue.




 
Journalists as Anti-Immigrant Activists | We Can Stop The Hate
Recursos en Espa–ol
TAKE THE HATE OUT OF THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE

Journalists as Anti-Immigrant Activists

Television (Go to Talk Radio)
First and foremost among media figures prominent in the immigration debate is CNN anchor Lou Dobbs, host of Lou Dobbs Tonight. Over the last several years, Dobbs has turned what was once a show devoted to covering business in America into a nightly harangue against immigrants and immigration. Unlike many other figures in the media, Dobbs makes no pretense to objectivity; he considers himself an "advocacy journalist." Dobbs, however, has gone way beyond advocacy by his frequent use of many of the code words identified in this report:

  • He has stated that he believes that "illegal aliens are criminals." (Lou Dobbs Tonight transcript, 4/6/05). Illegal immigrants are not considered criminals under current U.S. law.
  • He has used the term "anchor babies" to refer to the U.S.-born children of undocumented immigrants, suggesting inaccurately that having a U.S. citizen child is a means of acquiring legal immigration status or being protected from deportation. (Lou Dobbs Tonight transcript, 3/31/05).
  • He refers frequently to illegal aliens from Mexico into the United States as the "invasion" and as an "army of invaders" (Lou Dobbs Tonight transcript, 3/31/06). One of his reporters referred to a visit from Mexico's then-President Vicente Fox as a "Mexican military incursion."
  • Dobbs linked illegal aliens to a host of diseases including tuberculosis, malaria, and leprosy. In 2005, a reporter on the show claimed that there had been 7,000 new cases of leprosy in the previous three years, a claim disputed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (Lou Dobbs Tonight transcript, 4/14/05). To date, and despite protests to the contrary, Dobbs has never acknowledged the error on his show.
  • Lou Dobbs Tonight has featured several stories on the "reconquest" of the American Southwest. In one 2005 segment, a map purportedly showing "Aztlan" was provided to the show by the Council of Conservative Citizens, a prominent White supremacist organization (Lou Dobbs Tonight transcript, 5/23/06).

Although Dobbs has schooled himself to be very careful about how he refers to issues of race and ethnicity in the immigration debate, his zeal to bash immigrants and immigration at every opportunity has led him to provide a platform to many of the hate groups mentioned in this report. The spokespeople tied to hate groups and vigilantes discussed in this website have appeared on Dobbs' show 23 times since 2005:

  • Dobbs has also been a cheerleader for the Minuteman Project. He devoted extensive coverage to the Minuteman's first action in 2005, calling the the group a "remarkable success." Both Jim Gilchrist and Chris Simcox were frequent guests on the show, and on one occasion Dobbs wished Gilchrist "all the success in the world."
  • In 2005, Lou Dobbs Tonight featured the late Dr. Madeline Cosman as a "medical expert" in a discussion of the diseases that illegal aliens are bringing into the country. Ms. Cosman was not a medical doctor, but a prominent anti-immigrant activist who stated that Mexican immigrants were prone to molesting children (Lou Dobbs Tonight transcript, 6/8/05).
  • As noted before, one of the most well-known White supremacist groups in the country, the Council of Conservative Citizens, was featured as a "source" in a 2006 segment on the show.

Dobbs is hardly alone in his characterizations. In 2006, Dobbs' CNN colleague Jack Cafferty asserted that all participants in the immigration marches were "illegal aliens," stating, "Once again, the streets of our country were taken over today by people who don't belong here ... mobs of illegal aliens.... At some point this could all turn very violent as Americans become fed up with the failure of their government to address the most pressing domestic issue of our time."

In November 2007, MSNBC political commentator Pat Buchanan ranted, "You've got a wholesale invasion, the greatest invasion in human history coming across your southern border, changing the composition and character of your country," and, "I think America may exist, but I'll tell you this: I do believe we're going to lose the American Southwest. I think it is almost inevitable."

In July 2007, Fox News' Bill O'Reilly noted that most Americans "don't want [Mexicans] clustering in their neighborhoods and changing the whole tempo of the neighborhood." And in May 2006 he said, "According to the lefty zealots, the white Christians who hold power must be swept out by a new multicultural tide, a rainbow coalition, if you will."

Talk Radio (Go to Television)
Syndicated and local talk radio shows play a special role in the immigration debate as outlets for hate and extremism. Some examples:

  • Nationally syndicated radio talk show host Neal Boortz suggested to his listeners that "When we defeat this illegal alien amnesty bill, and when we yank out the welcome mat...as a going-away gift let's all give them a box of nuclear waste. Give 'em a little nuclear waste and let 'em take it on down there to Mexico."
  • Phoenix talk radio host Brian James encouraged his listeners to "randomly pick one night every week where we kill whoever crosses the border. Step over there and die." This prompted Arizona's attorney general to file a complaint with the FCC.
  • On his nationally syndicated radio show, Glenn Beck, who also has a show on CNN Headline News, joked about a refinery that produces "Mexinol," a fuel made from the bodies of illegal immigrants coming from Mexico. His website featured the ad for "Mexinol" as "the picture of the day" and noted that it was a "brilliant creation."

While the broader implications of the emergence of media celebrities acting as activists for specific causes and the growth of talk radio are beyond the scope of this report, one thing is clear - both phenomena have contributed significantly to the increased, perhaps unprecedented, use of hate speech and code words on the airwaves, specifically with respect to the issue of immigration and the presence of Hispanics in the U.S.

 
Suspect Spokespeople | We Can Stop The Hate
Recursos en Espa–ol
TAKE THE HATE OUT OF THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE

Suspect Spokespeople

Here are the top five ranking media "anti-immigrant spokespeople" with ties to nationally recognized hate groups, nativist-extremist groups, or vigilantes. They are listed by number of television network news appearances.

Rarely are these self-appointed spokespersons challenged by media outlets on their credentials, their organizations, or their history of "advocacy" on the immigration issue. They appear regularly on national television shows, but rarely opposite anyone who might provide another view or who might bring their affiliations with hate groups and vigilantes to light.

See where and how often they appear on network television
See their affiliations with hate groups and vigilantes

 

Other related links:
Code Words of Hate
Flashpoints

 
The Case | We Can Stop The Hate
Recursos en Espa–ol
TAKE THE HATE OUT OF THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE

The Case

Download the case files below: 

  • Virtually every large-scale civil rights atrocity in U.S. history was preceded by a widespread campaign vilifying a specific ethnic or religious group, and Latinos are only the most recent.   Code Words of Hate
  • The most recent Federal Bureau of Investigation Hate Crime Statistics report shows a significant increase in hate crimes committed against Latinos in the United States between 2004 and 2006. As the data in the case file show, there has been a steady growth of anti-Hispanic hate crimes since 2004, with the number of victims increasing by 25%  Hate Crimes
  • This case file identifies the following groups as hate or extremist groups and as being at the forefront of the hate speech directed toward Hispanics in the U.S. by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). Many of the spokespersons for these groups have appeared often and unchallenged on national news programs.  
    Hate and Extremist Groups
  • Mainstream national news outlets, especially the cable news networks, have provided highly visible platforms to representatives of the hate and extremist groups noted on this site. These representatives usually are identified simply as "opponents to illegal immigration," and their credentials and history with hate groups and vigilantism are barely, if ever, examined or challenged. Often they are scheduled with no opposing viewpoint represented. For the Latino community, "debating" these spokespeople is like having the NAACP debate the Ku Klux Klan on affirmative action - hardly an appropriate way to carry out an important policy debate.  Media Malpractice
 
See For Yourself | We Can Stop The Hate
Recursos en Espa–ol
TAKE THE HATE OUT OF THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE

See For Yourself

Browse our video library below for speeches, media appearances, and user generated content highlighting issues in the immigration debate from NCLR as well as some rather suspect spokespeople and the fanatical factions they represent - whether you know it or not.

 
About This Site | We Can Stop The Hate
Recursos en Espa–ol
TAKE THE HATE OUT OF THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE

About This Site

There is a small segment of the American population that occupies the "fringe" of American political debate.  They care little for reasoned debate or civil discourse.  They advocate hate - and sometimes violence - toward certain religious, ethnic, or racial groups. Everyone knows that they exist but would rather not acknowledge their presence as an active political voice in America. 
 
When it comes to immigration reform, however, they no longer are relegated to the fringe.  The rhetoric of hate groups, nativists, and vigilantes has taken over the lexicon of the public debate; their policy positions frame the country's political discourse, and their members have infiltrated the media as well as the ranks of those seeking to lead our country.  In short, hate and extremists are defining the debate on immigration - and the portrayal of Hispanic Americans - at every level.     

The time has come to take hate out of the debate.  Immigration is a serious issue requiring a reasoned and thoughtful debate.

This website:

  • Documents which hate groups and vigilantes are active in the anti-immigrant debate.
  • Catalogs the code words they use to demonize undocumented workers and to justify draconian public policies.
  • Demonstrates how those in the mainstream media are complicit in providing access to the airwaves to spokespeople tied to hate groups and vigilantes, and echo the rhetoric of hate themselves.
  • Reports on the rise in hate crimes against Latinos since 2004 (concurrent with the rise in hate speech surrounding the immigration debate) and catalogs many of the hate crimes committed against Latinos, as well as other kinds of abuse.

The National Council of La Raza (NCLR), which hosts this site, believes strongly in the values of this nation, in pluralism, and the ability of every American to share in the rights and responsibilities of this great country.  We believe that hate speech is un-American and undermines the strength and integrity of our country.

NCLR is calling on presidential candidates and elected officials at the national, state, and local levels to:

  • Denounce hate speech associated with the immigration debate and the Latino population
  • Reject code words that demonize immigrants and Hispanics
  • Renounce endorsements from those affiliated with hate groups, nativist-extremist groups, and vigilantes.  

Hate speech should have no place in the discussion of public policy at any level of government.

NCLR is also challenging the nation’s media to:

  • Screen and reject giving air time to “expert commentators” and “anti-immigrant spokespeople” known to be affiliated with hate groups, nativist-extremist groups, and vigilantes.
  • Ensure that if such spokespeople are given airtime, that their affiliations are made clear to viewers and that opposing points of view are given equal time.
  • Better screen hate speech from their websites and blogs.
 
About NCLR | We Can Stop The Hate
Recursos en Espa–ol
TAKE THE HATE OUT OF THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE

About NCLR

The National Council of La Raza (NCLR) - the largest national Hispanic civil rights and advocacy organization in the United States - works to improve opportunities for Hispanic Americans. Through its network of nearly 300 affiliated community-based organizations (CBOs), NCLR reaches millions of Hispanics each year in 41 states, Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia. To achieve its mission, NCLR conducts applied research, policy analysis, and advocacy, providing a Latino perspective in five key areas - assets/investments, civil rights/immigration, education, employment and economic status, and health. In addition, it provides capacity-building assistance to its Affiliates who work at the state and local level to advance opportunities for individuals and families.

Founded in 1968, NCLR is a private, nonprofit, nonpartisan, tax-exempt organization headquartered in Washington, DC. NCLR serves all Hispanic subgroups in all regions of the country and has operations in Atlanta, Chicago, Los Angeles, New York, Phoenix, Sacramento, San Antonio, and San Juan, Puerto Rico.

About This Site

There is a small segment of the American population that occupies the "fringe" of American political debate.  They care little for reasoned debate or civil discourse.  They advocate hate - and sometimes violence - toward certain religious, ethnic, or racial groups. Everyone knows that they exist but would rather not acknowledge their presence as an active political voice in America. 
 
When it comes to immigration reform, however, they no longer are relegated to the fringe.  The rhetoric of hate groups, nativists, and vigilantes has taken over the lexicon of the public debate; their policy positions frame the country's political discourse, and their members have infiltrated the media as well as the ranks of those seeking to lead our country.  In short, hate and extremists are defining the debate on immigration - and the portrayal of Hispanic Americans - at every level.     

The time has come to take hate out of the debate.  Immigration is a serious issue requiring a reasoned and thoughtful debate.

This website:

  • Documents which hate groups and vigilantes are active in the anti-immigrant debate.
  • Catalogs the code words they use to demonize undocumented workers and to justify draconian public policies.
  • Demonstrates how those in the mainstream media are complicit in providing access to the airwaves to spokespeople tied to hate groups and vigilantes, and echo the rhetoric of hate themselves.
  • Reports on the rise in hate crimes against Latinos since 2004 (concurrent with the rise in hate speech surrounding the immigration debate) and catalogs many of the hate crimes committed against Latinos, as well as other kinds of abuse.

The National Council of La Raza (NCLR), which hosts this site, believes strongly in the values of this nation, in pluralism, and the ability of every American to share in the rights and responsibilities of this great country.  We believe that hate speech is un-American and undermines the strength and integrity of our country.

NCLR is calling on presidential candidates and elected officials at the national, state, and local levels to:

  • Denounce hate speech associated with the immigration debate and the Latino population
  • Reject code words that demonize immigrants and Hispanics
  • Renounce endorsements from those affiliated with hate groups, nativist-extremist groups, and vigilantes.  

Hate speech should have no place in the discussion of public policy at any level of government.

NCLR is also challenging the nation’s media to:

  • Screen and reject giving air time to “expert commentators” and “anti-immigrant spokespeople” known to be affiliated with hate groups, nativist-extremist groups, and vigilantes.
  • Ensure that if such spokespeople are given airtime, that their affiliations are made clear to viewers and that opposing points of view are given equal time.
  • Better screen hate speech from their websites and blogs.
 
Contact Us | We Can Stop The Hate
Recursos en Espa–ol
TAKE THE HATE OUT OF THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE

Contact Us

Contact us using the form below.

If you're a member of the media, please see the contact information provided in our Media Center 

 
Privacy Policy | We Can Stop The Hate
Recursos en Espa–ol
TAKE THE HATE OUT OF THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE

Privacy Policy

PRIVACY STATEMENT

NCLR is committed to protecting the privacy of our website visitors. Please read this policy to understand what personal information we collect, why we collect it, and how we use this information.

We track our visitors' activities to make sure we are providing the best path and access to information. In the form of cookies, we track the number of recurring visits to our site to minimize pop-ups and the repetition of information that we have already made available to you.

Information Collection and Use
NCLR collects personally identifiable information in the following ways:

  • NCLR collects personal information when you make a donation. This information includes your name, address, telephone number, email address, and payment information.
  • You provide personal information (name, address, email address, and telephone/fax numbers) to the website of Capitol Advantage when you sign into our Action E-List. This database is maintained by Capitol Advantage, but NCLR has access to the database for use in its educational and advocacy activities. 
  • NCLR also collects personal information when you provide your comments to us via our contact form. This information includes your name, address, and email address. From time to time, NCLR solicits opinions from visitors to its site on specific topics.

We may on some occasions use information we collect to inform you of upcoming publications or other marketing material that would serve your interest. On occasion, we sell or share this information with individuals or organizations outside of NCLR for purposes consistent with NCLR's mission, including marketing or promotional purposes.

Links to Other Sites
Our site contains external links to other organizations and websites, and we do not control the use of data collection on external websites. We encourage you to read their policy statements and terms of use. This privacy policy statement governs only this site.

Security
Although NCLR takes all measures to prevent unauthorized access to and maintain the accuracy of your information, no information transferred over the Internet is 100% secure. NCLR cannot guarantee the total security of information transmitted to us.

By visiting our website, you understand our privacy statement and limitations. If you have any questions about this privacy statement, please contact NCLR by email at (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address), by phone at (202) 785-1670, by fax at (202) 776-1792, or by mail at NCLR, Webmaster, Raul Yzaguirre Building, 1126 16th St., NW, Washington, DC 20036.
Your use of this site is also governed by our Terms of Use Statement, so please read that as well.

TERMS OF USE
Welcome to the website of the Wave of Hope campaign of the National Council of La Raza. Please take a minute to read the rules that follow and understand that when you visit our site, it means that you agree to follow these terms and conditions. These terms may be modified or updated by us from time to time without notice. You can review the most current version of the Terms of Use at any time by clicking on this page. Please note that any personal information collected in connection with our site is governed by our Privacy Statement.

What This Site Contains
This site presents comprehensive information about the Wave of Hope campaign of the National Council of La Raza.

Use of Materials on This Website
The materials published on the site, including text, images, and illustrations (which we call the "Content"), are protected by copyrights, trademarks, service marks, and/or other proprietary rights and laws of the United States or other countries. You, a visitor to this site, acquire no rights or licenses to the Content other than the limited rights to use it in accordance with these terms, and you agree to abide by all posted copyright notices or restrictions relating to the Content. Except as provided in the next paragraph, you may not copy, reproduce, distribute, publish, display, perform, modify, create derivative works from, transmit, or in any way exploit any part of the Content.

You may download or copy the Content and other downloadable items displayed on the site for personal use only, provided that you keep intact all copyright and other notices contained therein. Copying or storing of any Content for purposes other than personal use is expressly prohibited without prior written permission from NCLR or the copyright holder identified in the copyright notice contained in the Content. Any unauthorized use of the Content may violate copyright laws, trademark laws, the laws of privacy and publicity, and communications regulations and statutes.

Trademark Information
The National Council of La Raza name, the phrase "NCLR," and the NCLR logo are protected trademarks and service marks of NCLR. No use of these names or logo may be made without the express written consent of NCLR. They are provided for personal, noncommercial use without right of reproduction.

Use of the NCLR Logo
The NCLR logo is used to identify our organization, products, and activities. You cannot use the NCLR logo without written permission, and only NCLR can grant authorization for use of the logo. For written permission, please contact (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). At the time permission is granted, NCLR will provide you with our requirements as to color, typeface, size, etc. for reproduction of the logo.

Improper use of the NCLR logo:

  • You cannot use the NCLR logo to refer to another organization or another organization's products or services.
  • You cannot use the NCLR logo in any manner that would confuse the viewer or could imply sponsorship or endorsement. 
  • You cannot change or alter the appearance of the NCLR logo. 
  • You cannot use the NCLR logo without giving NCLR proper ownership. 
  • You cannot use the NCLR logo as a link separate from an attaching URL.

Links
NCLR does not object to adding our link to your site as long as you adhere to the following guidelines:

If you have any questions concerning our Terms of Use, please contact NCLR at (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).